Tuesday, June 30, 2009
•
The economy: It’s always someone else’s money
Richard Deight, Orange County Register (CA)
As a nation, we like our entitlements. Perhaps the worst example, Social Security, is a gigantic wealth-redistribution and Ponzi scheme that would mean a prison sentence for the ringleaders if anyone but government ran it. Also at the top of the list is the ADA, which transfers private property rights from the able-bodied to the handicapped. "Special rights" trump individual needs and self-determination every time. After all, we must all do our part to provide for the "greater good." If Ayn Rand were alive today, she would have a field day.
• •
Socialized healthcare is a severe threat to individual liberty
Andrew Foy and Brenton Stransky, American Thinker
Altruism
In Radicals for Capitalism Brian Doherty stated Ayn Rand's belief that, "people don't care if something doesn't work as long as the dominant morality of altruism tells them that it is right." For opponents of government-run healthcare to succeed they must not only convince the public that the Administration's plan will fail to deliver on its promises but also explain how the plan will severely infringe on individual liberty, which the government of this country was designed to protect.
Monday, June 29, 2009
•
Saver nation
John Nadler, International Business Times
FreedomFest 2009, scheduled for July 9-11 [...] in Las Vegas, will smash all records, with over 1,000 expected to attend, including dozens of experts, authors, think tanks, and media. [....] See Missouri history professor Steven Watts on “Fantasyland, Walt Disney, and the American Dream,” followed by “Playboy, Hugh Hefner, and the American Dream”…..plus Don Hauptman on Ayn Rand's Playboy interview.
• •
Tea parties amd going John Galt: America’s new direction?
Sylvia Bokor, Capitalism Magazine
Atlas Shrugged
Capitalism
Objectivist author
"Capitalism," novelist/philosopher Ayn Rand wrote, "is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned." In a completely free society, the government's role is solely to protect individual rights. It leaves men free to produce or not as they choose, to work to the best of their ability or not as they choose, to trade with others, to benefit from their own effort, to save and invest and support charities as they choose. But over many decades government has increasingly violated our rights and eroded our freedom.
•
Gift of the write stuff can lead to problems
Michael Riley, Asbury Park Press (NJ)
Reading can expose you to all kinds of crazy ideas — those of Karl Marx and Ayn Rand just to name two. And don't get me started Nietzsche. . . . What it is about all that "Will to power, God is dead" stuff that attracts males in late adolescence? Personally, I blame violence-laden video games.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
•
Violent direct action is terrorism, not protest
D. Christian Moore, The Examiner
I support a robust and engaged civil society, complete with free expression from all sides of the spectrum. Heck, I am an objectivist and a strict constitutionalist, I want people protesting everything, just so politicians know we will hold them accountable.
•
The source of the current economic crisis: “A Chicago state of mind”
Maidhc Ó'Cathail, Global Research
Capitalism
“Then Clinton-era ‘reform’ of investor protections, led by Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin, former co-chairman of Goldman Sachs, enabled the ‘financial supermarkets’ at the core of this collapse -- including Citigroup where he became a senior executive alongside CEO Sandy Weill,” [says Jeff Gates]. [....] “Rubin successor Larry Summers (now Barack Obama’s top economic adviser) fought for ‘reforms’ that de-regulated financial derivatives -- magnifying the impact of the crash as those arcane arrangements grew from $88 trillion a decade ago to a market that now represents transactions with a face value of $600 trillion,” Gates says. “Add to that toxic mix the easy credit policies of a central bank overseen by Alan Greenspan, a disciple of Ayn Rand, a Russian-Ashkenazi philosopher and market fundamentalist.”
•
Technoprogressives and transhumanists: What’s the difference?
Mike Treder, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies
It’s not always easy [...] for me to appreciate [...] some of the extreme Ayn Randian dogma that makes up a small segment of transhumanist viewpoints.
• •
Meg & Dia are smart singing sisters
Tom Lanham, San Francisco Examiner
Atlas Shrugged
Egoism
“I don’t enjoy reading modern books at all,” [Meg Frampton] says. “For education, I’ve relied on classics by Fitzgerald, Salinger, because I’m really interested in the way they saw things.” That’s how the exotic Korean-American beauty [...] stumbled across her most crucial text: Ayn Rand’s 1957 classic “Atlas Shrugged,” which details Objectivism, the author’s controversial philosophy of pursuing one’s own self-interest. “That’s the book that really got me going,” she says. “When I read it, it was the absolute truth, and that was how I was going to live my life. There’s a bad connotation to the word ‘selfish,’ but there shouldn’t be — it means that you look out for yourself, not walk all over people to get what you want. And if you’re doing it the way Rand says, you actually help others along the way.”
•
Not much ado about nothing
Nancy Coppock, American Thinker
While nihilism is a respectable philosophical school, it is best handled by those who actually think. In the hands of those who do not, it is an easy philosophy to practice but deadly to cultural advancement. Even the Republican Party is having trouble becoming a Randian man, an Adam, standing separate from the devolving popular culture. The situation is beyond apathy, as the apathetic at least have an inkling of the ideas they believe cannot be changed.
•
Unrecognizable to a Scribner
Roger Baylor, News and Tribune (Jeffersonville, IN)
Today's rant isn't about tax rates, free enterprise, “don't tread on me” or Ayn Rand's positivist philosophy. It's about paralytic dissenters, Lilliputian naysayers and the corrosion wrought by the knee-jerk instinct of voters to anoint oblivious ward heelers whose only discernable platform is abject surrender to the debilitating defilements of urban decay management.
•
Ex-Lehman partner cooks up frisky domestic diva, hot IPO
Laurie Muchnick, Bloomberg
Review of the novel Love and Money, by Michael M. Thomas.[Characters] Clifford and Jekyll sometimes sound as if they’ve wandered in from an Ayn Rand novel, lecturing each other on morals: “If this country’s most-advantaged citizens, the people with the most chips, don’t stand up for what’s right and principled, there’s no hope,” Jekyll says, trying to convince Clifford to go along with the case.